SUBSTANTIVE COMPONENT OF THE FORMATION SYSTEM OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY CULTURE FOR FUTURE PHD

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/academ-ped.psyh-2024-1.11

Keywords:

substantive component, graduate student, academic integrity culture, research supervisor, university environment, educational and scientific process

Abstract

The article illuminates the structure of the substantive component in forming the system of cultivating the culture of academic integrity at the III educational-scientific level in Ukrainian higher education institutions. The aim is to characterize the substantive component of the system for cultivating the culture of academic integrity among future philosophy PhDs during their professional training. Methodology. The work employs various scientific methods, including induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, abstraction and specification. Various analysis methods were used in the research, including theoretical, descriptive, processing, and interpretation methods. Additional techniques such as observation, classification, and systematization were also utilized. The scientific novelty lies in proposing a three-element structure of the substantive component of the system for cultivating the culture of academic integrity among future philosophy PhDs during their professional training; providing a characterization of the development of an axiologically significant environment in higher education institutions; describing the scientific and methodological activities with the graduating department, particularly with the research supervisor; and organizing educational and research activities with future PhDs. Conclusions. The significant component in forming the culture of academic integrity among future philosophy PhDs manifests through various spheres of activity at three levels. Firstly, it encompasses designing the axiologicalmeaningful environment of higher education institutions. The second level involves the scientific-methodological work of the faculty, including academic supervisors, involved in the preparation of future philosophy PhDs. Lastly, the third level encompasses educational and research activities with future philosophy PhDs. Building this system involves both designing an appropriate educational and scientific environment and interacting with key stakeholders of this system. The development of future philosophy PhDs occurs at different stages within our system, starting with the adaptivecognitive stage, where they adapt to the academic environment. At the activity-technological stage, they shape their position and demonstrate the profession's values through engagement in various activities. The role of the academic faculty shifts from supervisory to collaborative, where learners take the lead, guided by the culture of academic integrity.

References

Батечко Н., Михайліченко М. Феномен академічної доброчесності в контексті синергії наукових піходів. Освітологія. 2019. № 8. С. 26–33.

Гаруст Ю., Павленко Б. Академічна доброчесність – шлях до захисту інтелектуальної власності українських науковців. Правові горизонти. 2017. С. 88–95.

Згуровський М. Дипломована псевдоосвіта, або Суперечності перехідного періоду у сфері вищої освіти України. Дзеркало тижня. 2006. URL: http://gazeta.dp.ua/EDUCATION/diplomovana_psevdoosvita_abo_superechnosti_perehidnogo_periodu_u_sferi_vischoyi_osviti_ukrayini.html

Малогулко Ю.В., Затхей М.В. Проблеми академічної доброчесності у вищих навчальних закладах. Матеріали XLVII науково-технічної конференції підрозділів ВНТУ. 2018. URL: https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/all-hcvr/all-hcvr-2018/paper/view/3857

Меняйло В.І. Теоретичні і методичні засади підготовки майбутніх докторів філософії до дослідницько-інноваційної діяльності : дис. … д.пед.н. : 13.00.04. Запоріжжя, 2020. 756 с.

Тицька Я. Академічна доброчесність та академічна відповідальність у забезпеченні якості освіти. Теорія держави та права. 2018. № 11. С. 192–195.

Bologna Seminar Doctoral Programmes for the European Knowledge Society. Salzburg, 3–5 February 2005. European University Association. URL: https://eua. eu/downloads/publications/salzburg%20recommendations%202005.pdf

Descriptors defining levels in the European Qualifications Framework (EQF). European Comission. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/ploteus/en/content/descriptors

Doctoral Education – Taking Salzburg Forward. Implementation and New Challenges. Brussels : EUA, 2016. 8 p. URL: https://www.eua cde.org/downloads/publications/2016_euacde_doctoral-salzburg-implementation-new challenges.pdf

Exploration of the implementation of the Principles for Innovative Doctoral Training in Europe: Final Report European Commission, DGRTDReference: ARES (2011) 932978. URL: https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/5141476

Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March 2000. Presidency Conclusions. European Parliament. URL: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm

Salzburg II Recommendations. European Universities’ Achievements since 2005 in Implementing the Salzburg Principles. Brussels: EUA, 2010. 8 p. EUA. URL: https://eua.eu/downloads/publications/salzburg%20ii%20recommendations%202010. Pdf

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Brussels : CS Ltd., 2015. 32 p.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-17