INNOVATIVE MECHANISMS FOR MITIGATING THE CURRENT RESOURCE AND CLIMATE CRISIS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-5681-2025-2.04

Keywords:

anthropogenic load, business transformation, ecologisation of economy, climate change, resource shortage

Abstract

The aim of the article is to study the latest compensatory mechanisms for regulating the consequences of the environmental crisis through the implementation of environmental protection policies, taking into account current trends in the development of the global economy. The article analyses the monetary equivalent of climate losses in some European Union countries and the dynamics of compensatory contributions in the context of global climate commitments, which characterise the financial component of the consequences of climate change and the prospects for their impact on the speed of economic transformation in the context of modern social and economic challenges. It has been established that the introduction of innovative technologies implies an increase in the pace of economic development, taking into account the potential resource deficit and the deepening of destructive climate change. It is offered to develop new concepts for implementing a policy of balanced nature management using progressive systems for modernising and ecologising the economy. The research methodology is based on conducting a systematic study of innovative technologies that can contribute to solving resource, climate and technological issues and ensure the effectiveness of sustainable development policies. The scientific novelty of the work is related to the need for a fundamental justification of fundamental directions of ecologisation of the economy through the introduction of innovative technologies to ensure a high level of production quality and reduce anthropogenic impact on the environment. Conclusions. Taking into account the rapid growth in demand for natural resources, one of the main priorities today is to develop technologies that make rational use of natural materials and convert harmful and dangerous substances into useful ones for economic complexes. The formation of a climate-neutral economy involves the creation of new types of production, increasing the efficient use of resources by transitioning to a clean circular economy, and reducing atmospheric pollution.

References

Arora N. Impact of climate change on agriculture production and its sustainable solutions. Environmental Sustainability. 2019. № 2. P. 95–96. DOI: 10.1007/s42398-019-00078-w

Bodansky D. The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: A Postmortem. American Journal of International Law. 2010. Vol. 104. № 2. P. 230–240.

Database on instruments used for environmental policy. URL: http://www2.oecd.org/ecoinst/queries/Query_2.aspx?QryCtx=1# (дата звернення: 12.09.2025)

Eurostat. Environmental tax revenues. URL: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_ac_tax&lang=en (дата звернення: 12.09.2025).

Eckstein D., Kunzel V., Schafer L. Global climate risk 2021. Who suffers most from extreme weather events? Weather-related loss events in 2019 and 2000–2019. 2021.

Eswaran U., Eswaran V. Decarbonization: pathways for a sustainable future. Journal on Future Engineering & Technology. 2023. № 18 (4).

Finkbeiner M., Bach V. Life cycle assessment of decarbonization options–towards scientifically robust carbon neutrality. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2021. № 26 (4). P. 635–639.

Martinich J., Crimmins A. Climate damages and adaptation potential across diverse sectors of the United States. Nature Climate Change. 2019. № 9. P. 397–404.

Market Stability Reserve. European Commission. Climate Action.EU Action. EU Emissions Trading System (СТВ ЄС). URL: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/marketstability-reserve_en (дата звернення: 11.09.2025).

Newman R., Noy I. The global costs of extreme weather that are attributable to climate change. Nat Commun 14, 6103 (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41888-1

Oliveira A.M., Beswick R.R., Yan Y. A green hydrogen economy for a renewable energy society. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering. 2021. № 33. P. 100701.

Regulation (EC) № 842/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on certain fluorinated greenhouse gases. OJ L 161, 14.06.2006. P. 1–11. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32006R0842 (дата звернення: 11.09.2025).

Singhal K., Pawar A., Deedwania S. Impact of Climate Change on Oil and Gas Sector and Mitigation Approach for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Climate Action and Water Management. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8237-0_19

Schreyer F., Luderer G., Rodrigues R., Pietzcker R.C., Baumstark L., Sugiyama M., Ueckerdt F. Common but differentiated leadership: strategies and challenges for carbon neutrality by 2050 across industrialized economies. Environmental Research Letters. 2020. № 15 (11). P. 114016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb852

The Politics of Climate Change: Environmental Dynamics in International Affairs / ed. P.G. Harris. London : Routledge, 2009. 240 p.

Umar M., Raza M.Y., Xu Y. Determinants of CO2 emissions and economic progress: a case from a developing economy. Heliyon. 2023. № 9 (1). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12303

Wüstenhagen R., Wolsink M., Burer M.J. Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy Innovation: An Introduction to the Concept. Energy Policy. 2007. № 35 (5). P. 2683–2691. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001

Ziegler R. Climate Neutrality – Towards An Ethical Conception of Climate Neutrality. Ethics, Policy & Environment. 2016. № 19. P. 256–272.

Published

2025-12-17

Most read articles by the same author(s)